Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48407 of 2002 Petitioner :- Amit Verma Respondent :- B.S.A. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.D. Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- P.D. Sharma,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the selection of Smt. Shanti Devi, respondent no. 4, communicated to her by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Etawah vide his letter dated 9-9-2002 contained in Annexure-2 to the writ petition.
(ii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to hold selection out of the said three candidates belonging to Backward class by holding an actual meeting of Gram Shiksha Samiti, under the terms and condition of the said Yojna.
(iii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Basic Shiksha Adhikari (Respondent no. 1) to prosecute Smt. Shanti Devi respondent no. 4 and the Pradhan, respondent no. 2 for filing forged marksheet of High School before the Basic Shiksha Adhikari (a public servant), for the sake of selection of Smt. Shanti Devi as Shiksha Mitra."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 Siddhant Sahu