Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Amit Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13491 of 2018 Applicant :- Amit Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pulak Ganguly,Balwant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shiv Nath Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
The argument is that the allegation in the F.I.R. is that a sum of rupees 1,41,17,000/- has been paid to the accused-applicant by R.T.G.S.
The counsel for the applicant states that the amount paid to the applicant by R.T.G.S. and cheques by the informant shall be credited in bank A/c. of the informant, except the amount of about Rs. 15 lakhs, which have been taken as sale consideration in the sale deeds attached as one of the annexures of the affidavit in support of the bail application, within a week.
List this case on 06.08.2018.
Order Date :- 30.7.2018 Rohit
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amit Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2018
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Pulak Ganguly Balwant Singh