Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Amit Saxena vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7805 of 2018 Petitioner :- Amit Saxena Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 03 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Srivastava,Dheeraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
Heard Sri Manoj Srivastava, jlearned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Singh, learned AGA for the State.
Learned AGA pointed out that the Smt. Kiran has been wrongly arrayed as respondent no.4 being informant in the present petition though she is not the informant of the case and informant is Ravi Verma.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh petition.
The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh petition.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of the FIR to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining a photocopy of the same.
(Krishna Pratap Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 30.3.2018 Gaurav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amit Saxena vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 March, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Manoj Srivastava Dheeraj Kumar Pandey