Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Amit Joshi And Another vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 January, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Sri Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the first information report of the alleged incident is delayed by eight days for which no plausible explanation has been given by the prosecution, which itself falsify the prosecution story. It is further submitted that no such incident has ever taken place. It is further submitted that no incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicants. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicants have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicants that they are ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make themselves available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicants are languishing in jail since 13.10.2020. It has been pointed out that the applicants have no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicants- Amit Joshi and Vikas Joshi, be released on bail in Case Crime No.412 of 2020, under Sections- 308, 323 and 201 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Mandi, District- Saharanpur, on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties (one should be of a family member) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicants will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. They will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. They will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad. The concerned Court shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad.
Order Date :- 8.1.2021 Dev/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amit Joshi And Another vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 January, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh