Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Amit @ Bitto @ Amit Chaudhary And Others vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8179 of 2021 Applicant :- Amit @ Bitto @ Amit Chaudhary And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 037 of 2021, under Sections 498A, 420, 406, 452, 354 (Kha) 323, 504, 506 IPC Police Station- Mahila thana, District- Saharanpur.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 6.4.2021 Arshad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amit @ Bitto @ Amit Chaudhary And Others vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Dinesh Kumar Yadav