Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Amiable Electronics Pvt Ltd vs The Nodal Officer Joint Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Division And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|17 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.P.No.52413/2019 (T-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S. AMIABLE ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER SHRI. RAAKESH J.JHUNJHUNWALA NO.36/6 C/O DHL SUPPLY CHAIN PRIVATE LIMITED SOMASANDRAPALYA, NEAR KEB POWER STATION HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 102.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJU H.Y., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE NODAL OFFICER JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DIVISION – 6, KIADB BUILDING 14TH CROSS, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA PEENYA 2ND STAGE BENGALURU – 560 072 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES GSTO-35A, LIC BUILDING 2ND FLOOR, JEEVANBHIMA NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 075 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES LGSTO-16, VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA RAJENDRA NAGARA, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU – 560 047 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA GANDHINAGARA BANGALORE – 560 009 5. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX POST BOX NO.5400, C.R.BUILDING QUEEN’S ROAD BENGALURU – 560 001 6. THE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL 5TH FLOOR, TOWER II JEEVAN BHARTI BUILDING JANPATH ROAD, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI – 110 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JEEVAN J.NEERALAGI, CGC FOR R1, R5 & R6; SRI T.K. VEDAMURTHY, AGA FOR R2, R3 & R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS EITHER TO OPEN THE GST COMMON PORTAL THEREBY ALLOWING THE PETITIONER TO SUBMIT FORM GST TRAN-2 OR DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ACCEPT FORM GST TRAN-2 ALREADY FILED MANNUALLY VIDE LETTER 22.10.2019 IN ANNEXURE – D AND ENABLE THE PETITIONER THE BENEFIT OF TRANSIT CREDIT IN TERMS OF SECITON 140(3) OF CGST ACT, 2017 R/W IN TERMS OF RULE 117(4)(B)(III) OF CGST RULES, 2017 AND SECITON 172 OF CGST ACT, 2017 AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to open the GST Common Portal thereby allowing the petitioner to submit Form GST TRAN-2 or direct the respondents to accept the Form GST TRAN-2 already filed manually vide letter dated 22.10.2019 at Annexure – D and enable the petitioner to avail the benefit of transit credit in terms of Section 140(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘CGST Act’ for short) read with Rule 117(4)(b)(iii) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and Section 172 of CGST Act, 2017.
2. The petitioner is a Private Limited Company engaged in the activity of wholesale trade of desktop computers, portable laptops, computer accessories, mobiles and gadgets etc. The petitioner was registered as a ‘dealer’ under the provisions of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (‘KVAT Act’ for short). On introduction of new tax regime i.e. Goods and Services Tax with effect from 01.07.2017, the petitioner is registered under the provisions of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (KGST & CGST Act). It is submitted that in order to avail the transit credit of duty of tax levied by the Central Government, the petitioner in terms of transit provisions, electronically submitted and filed GST TRAN-1 Form in GST Common Portal. However, the GST TRAN-2 Form was not filed within the due date for a bona-fide reason as the concerned Accountant of the petitioner’s Company had left the organization during that period. After the period prescribed for filing of the GST TRAN-2 Form lapsed, the petitioner had made efforts to avail the transitional credit by submitting the application/representation but the Common Portal was not opened.
3. It is submitted that the Nodal Officer has not considered the application/representation submitted by the petitioner hence, the petitioner was constrained to file the GST TRAN-2 Form manually, but the same has not been accepted by the respondent-Authorities.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is evident that the application/representation submitted by the petitioner before the Nodal Officer/respondent No.1 has remained unconsidered. In the light of the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No.19076/2019 dated 26.04.2019, the Nodal Officer is obligated to consider the application/representation seeking permission to upload GST TRAN-2 Form electronically or manually. This Court while considering the filing/revising of GST TRAN-I Form in Writ Petition No.33290/2019 and allied matters elaborately discussed the provisions of the CGST Act as well as the rulings of the different Hon’ble Courts holding the field.
5. In the light of Section 140 read with Sections 142 and 172 of the CGST Act as well as Rule 117 (1) of the CGST rules and the Circular dated 03.04.2018, the Nodal Officer is directed to consider the application/representation submitted by the petitioner and take a decision in an expedite manner, in any event, not later than 8 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE KTY
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Amiable Electronics Pvt Ltd vs The Nodal Officer Joint Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Division And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha