1.It appears that the petitioner has filed this writ petition based on an apprehension that without adjudication, his bank accounts may be attached. The apprehension appears to emanate from the summons dated 24.01.2017.
2.Mr.A.P.Srinivas, who appears on advance notice says that a perusal of the summons would show that the petitioner has only been called for the purpose of recording his statement and, to submit the balance sheet as also details of his bank account. 2.1.Furthermore, Mr.Srinivas, says that the summons issued, by itself, should not create any apprehension in the mind of the petitioner; at least not at this stage. 2.2.Mr.Srinivas, also assures the Court that no precipitative steps will be taken against the petitioner, without following due process of law.
3.Having regard to the submissions made by Mr.Srinivas, the learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, says he does not wish to press the petition.
4.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. Consequently, the connected pending application is also closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
14.02.2017 pri Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No To Commissioner of Service Tax Service Tax I Commissionerate Survey, Intelligence & Research Section 2054-1, II Avenue Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.
RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.
pri W.P.No.3502 of 2017 And W.M.P.No.3513 of 2017 14.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in