Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

A.Mani vs The Personal Assistant To The ...

Madras High Court|11 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as Infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.
11.09.2017 msm To
1. The Personal Assistant to the Director, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Chennai  05.
2. The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Salem District, Salem.
3. Mr.M.Devendran (Driver), O/o District Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.
W.P.No.35942 of 2015
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

A.Mani vs The Personal Assistant To The ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
11 September, 2017