Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Aman vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22898 of 2019 Applicant :- Aman Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Mohan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Applicant- Aman seeks bail in Case Crime No. 384 of 2019, under Sections 379, 356 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District- Etah.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that the role of snatching chain has specifically been assigned to co-accused, who has fled away from the scene of incident. However, the applicant was arrested but no recovery whatsoever has been made either from his possession or at his pointing out. Lastly, it is submitted that applicant is in jail since 19.4.2019 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit.
Per contra, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts and the fact that applicant is in jail since 19.4.2019 and has no criminal history to his credit.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let applicant Aman be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 KU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Aman vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Ram Mohan