Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Aman Sngh And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 May, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 90
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8971 of 2021 Applicant :- Aman Sngh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Yatharth Srivastava,Sanjay Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Despite link sent to learned counsel for the applicants, none appeared to participate in the proceeding of present matter through video conferencing. Learned A.G.A. is present through video conferencing.
It is submitted by learned A.G.A. that present anticipatory bail relates to commission of offence under U.P. Gangsters and Anti- Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and therefore, the same is not maintainable in the light of provisions of Section 438 (6) of the Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, present anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 12.5.2021 Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Aman Sngh And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 May, 2021
Judges
  • Dinesh Pathak
Advocates
  • Yatharth Srivastava Sanjay Dwivedi