Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Alok Singh And Others vs State Of Up And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33148 of 2018 Applicant :- Alok Singh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22.08.2017 and proceedings of Case No. 13 of 2018 (State vs. Alok Singh and others), under Sections 34, 323, 324, 452, 506 IPC, P.S. Khutar, District Shahjahanpur pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Powayan, District Shahjahanpur.
On perusal of the impugned charge sheet and the materials in support of the same, this Court does not find it to be a case which can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court cannot hold a parallel trial in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such ground appears to be available to the applicants, on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be quashed going by the settled law in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283.
Accordingly, the prayer for quashing the charge sheet and proceedings is refused.
However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 45 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicants have got a right of discharge under Section 239 or 227/228 Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and they are free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.
For a period of 45 days from today or till the applicants surrender whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid directions, the application is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 20.9.2018 Imroz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Alok Singh And Others vs State Of Up And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 September, 2018
Judges
  • J
Advocates
  • Arvind Kumar Srivastava Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma