IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.11319 OF 2018 (GM-PASS) BETWEEN:
ALIREZA DARINI S/O. MOHAMMAD DARINI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. 28, 3RD FLOOR, ARGHAWAN ALLEY SOUTH DIBAJI STREET, TEHRAN, IRAN-1951796614, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, MR. MOHAN LAL UNIYAL, S/O. ISHWARI DUTT UNIYAL, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, EXTRUSIONSTECHNIK LTD., 1108-1110, HEMKUNT, HOUSES 6, RAJENDRA PLACE, NEW DELHI-110 008. … PETITIONER (BY SMT.FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.MOHAMMED FAROOQ, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, FOREIGNERS DIVISION, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NDCC-2 BUILDING, JAI SINGH ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 001.
2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOREIGNERS REGIONAL REGISTERED OFFICE TTMCA BLOCK, 5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.A.CHANDRA CHUD, ADV. FOR R-1; R-2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS AND DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE VISA TO THE PETITIONER THROUGH INDIAN EMBASSY TEHRAN, REPUBLIC OF IRAN BY CONSIDERING THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATIONS DATED:24.01.2018 AT ANNEXURE-F AND THE REPRESENTATION DATED:29.01.2018 AT ‘G’ ADDRESSED TO THE INDIAN ENBASSY, TEHRAN, IRAN.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Smt.Farah Fathima, learned counsel for Sri.Mohammed Farooq, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.A.Chandra Chud, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to the respondents to issue visa to the petitioner through Indian Embassy, Tehran, Republic of Iran by considering the petitioner’s representations dated 24.01.2018 at Annexure-F and the representation dated 29.01.2018 at Annexure-G addressed to the Indian Embassy, Tehran, Iran.
2. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representations dated 24.01.2018 and 29.01.2018 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
3. In view of the submission made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the competent authority shall decide the representations submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-