Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Algu Prasad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32418 of 2004 Petitioner :- Algu Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner on the post of Chowkidar in the department.
(b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the minimum pay-scale alongwith other allowances which is being paid to the regular Chowkidars in the department until the regularisation of the services of the petitioner is made."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.7.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Algu Prasad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Vinod Dwivedi