Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Ala Meri @ Eshwaramma vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh

High Court Of Telangana|31 December, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.41316 of 2014 Between:
Ala Meri @ Eshwaramma, W/o. Ala Venkata Subbaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ: House wife, R/o. Door No.1-90, Pothuru, Old Guntur, Guntur City.
.. Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Stamps & Registration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & 4 others ..
Respondents The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.41316 of 2014 ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue.
2. The plea of the petitioner is that she purchased property bearing D.No.302, to an extent of Ac. 0.90 cents, situated at Chowdavaram Revenue Village, Guntur Municipality, Guntur District. When the petitioner presented a document before the Sub-Registrar-I, Prathipadu, Guntur District (5th respondent), the Sub-Registrar-I refused to register the said document.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the Sub-Registrar cannot refuse the document presented before him at the threshold and such decision of the Sub-Registrar is without jurisdiction and competence.
4. The Registering Authority has to act in accordance with the provisions contained in the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The Registration Act, 1908, envisages the power on the Registering Authority to receive a document presented before it and process the same in accordance with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and if there are any valid reasons for refusing such registration, the Registering Authority should assign reasons, pass an order and communicate the same to the party under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. Thus, the refusal of document at the threshold is without competence and jurisdiction. However, no proof is filed in support of the contention that the registering authority refused to receive the document when presented by the petitioner.
5. For the aforesaid reasons, without expressing any opinion on merits on the issue, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to present the document with regard to the property claimed to have been owned by her in D.No.302, situated at Chowdavaram Revenue Village, Guntur Municipality, Guntur District, before the Registering Authorities. As and when such document is presented, the Registering Authority shall receive and process the same in accordance with the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. If the Registering Authority is of the opinion that the document is otherwise in order, he shall register and release the document. If according to the registering authority, the document cannot be processed for registration he shall assign due reasons, pass an order and communicate the same to the petitioner under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. In such an event, the petitioner is entitled to work out his remedies. Such exercise shall be completed by the Sub-
Registrar-I, Prathipadu, Guntur District (5th respondent) within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of presentation of the document. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 31st December, 2014 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.41316 of 2014 Date: 31st December, 2014 KL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ala Meri @ Eshwaramma vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
31 December, 2014
Judges
  • P Naveen Rao