Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Akshay And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23962 of 2018 Petitioner :- Akshay And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 02 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Pandey,Satyendra Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri N.K. Verma, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 10.08.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 248 of 2018, under Sections 302 IPC, Police Station-Chhapar, District Muzaffar Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the name of the petitioners has come into the light in the confessional statement of the co-accused. The petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations levelled against the petitioners are absolutely false, frivolous and baseless. From a perusal of the FIR, no offence is made out against the petitioners, hence, the same be quashed.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. which discloses cognizable offence.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 30.8.2018 AU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Akshay And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 August, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Sushil Kumar Pandey Satyendra Narayan Singh