Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17351 of 2018 Applicant :- Akshay @ Seepu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Devendra Vikram Singh,Rakesh Chandra,Sanjay Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List revised. No one appears on behalf of the complainant to press this application.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Akshay @ Seepu with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 205 of 2014, under Sections 363, 366, 364, 120-B IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District- Etah, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. Applicant was not named in the First Information Report.He has been implicated on the basis of second statement of complainant recorded by the police under section 161 Cr.P.c.There is no evidence against him and named accuseds are absconding and police has not arrested them. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant and he has implicated only on the basis of last seen evidence. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.1.2018.Applicant has explained his criminal history in paragraph-22 of the affidavit filed in support of the application. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Akshay @ Seepu involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 Atul kr. sri.