Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Akriti Sanjay Manwani vs Union Of India And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|11 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT W.P.No.8569 OF 2017 (EDN-CET) BETWEEN AKRITI SANJAY MANWANI, D/O. KAVITA MANWANI, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, RESIDING AT GARDENIA, RBI LAYOUT, JP NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, PUTTENAHALLI, BENGALURU – 560 062. REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER, KAVITA MANWANI, W/O. SANJAY MANWANI, AGED ABOIUT 48 YEARS. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. KIRAN B.S, ADVOCATE) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI-110 001.
2. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF OVERSEAS INDIAN AFFAIRS, AKBAR BHAWAN, CHANAKYAPURI, NEW DELHI-110 021.
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.
4. KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY, 18TH CROSS RD, MALLESHWARAM WEST, BENGALURU-560 012.
REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.
5. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COMMON ENTRANCE TEST (CET CELL) FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCAITON CELL MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.N.CHANDRASHEKAR, CGSC FOR R1 & R2; SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R3;
SRI N.K.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-5 TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER TO APPEAR FOR CET EXAM OF 2017 TO BE HELD ON APRIL 2017 AT THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE THE HON’BLE COURT IS PRAYED TO DIRECT THE R-5 TO PROVIDE HER OPPURTUNITY AS PER WITH THE OTHER STUDENTS WHO ARE STUDYING IN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA LIKE THE PETITIONER AT THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R The learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a Memo dated 11.02.2019 seeking withdrawal of Writ Petition as having become infructuous. The Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed in terms of Memo filed; reserving liberty to the Petitioner to seek any other redressal of his grievance, in accordance with law.
Costs made easy.
cbc Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Akriti Sanjay Manwani vs Union Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 February, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit