Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Akhlakh Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16756 of 2021 Petitioner :- Akhlakh Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shitlesh Pandey,Pramod Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Ref: Civil Misc Amendment Application No.1 of 2021.
Amendment application has been filed stating therein that by inadvertence name of the petitioner has wrongly been disclosed as Akhlakh Ahmad though it should be Akhlad Ahmad.
Accordingly, the amendment application is allowed.
Let the amendment be incorporated during course of the day. Office to make necessary correction in computer record.
Order on writ petition.
1. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Chetan Chaterjee, learned counsel appearing for respondent-Corporation and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
2. Challenge has been raised to the recovery proceedings pending against the petitioner, seeking recovery of Rs. 1,47,401/- towards electricity dues.
3. On similar facts, by a separate order passed in Writ - C No. 17098 of 2021, we have disposed of that writ petition with directions including filing of proper objections and consideration of the same before further recoveries may be made.
4. For the reasons contained in that order, the present writ petition is also disposed of on the following terms :
(i) subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.30,000/- within a period of two weeks from today i.e. not later than 16 August, 2021, the respondent no.5 shall make available to the petitioner all adverse material that is being relied in support of the communication dated 02.03.2020 (annexed as Annexure No.4 to the petition);
(ii) upon being thus confronted with the adverse material, the petitioner shall have a right to file a detailed objection to the action proposed by the respondent no.5 within a further period of two weeks therefrom annexing therewith all material as the petitioner may seek to rely on;
(iii) upon receipt of such objection, the said respondent no.5 shall fix a date for hearing in the matter within a period of two weeks therefrom and pass appropriate and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, after hearing the parties within a period of one month therefrom.
5. For a period of two months from today or till disposal of the aforesaid objection, whichever is earlier, no coercive measure shall be adopted against the petitioner, subject to his complying with the terms of this order.
6. All further recovery shall abide by the decision to be made by the respondent-corporation.
Order Date :- 30.7.2021 A.Kr.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Akhlakh Ahmad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2021
Judges
  • Naheed Ara Moonis
Advocates
  • Shitlesh Pandey Pramod Kumar Maurya