Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Akhilendra Pratap Singh vs State Of U P Thru Secretary Home Lknw And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18436 of 2021 Petitioner :- Akhilendra Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru Secretary Home Lknw. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Gaur,Sanjay Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.S.Parihar
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the following prayer:-
"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.2, to revalue the question nos.23, 66, 91 & 124 Booklet Series-D of U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board-PGT-2021- Hindi, for the post of Lecturer, conducted on 17/08/2021 and to proceed with selection and allocation of post based on the revaluation and consequently direct the respondent to revalue the answer book of the petitioner (Roll no.1011022831) having Registration no.UP00230020494127 and select the petitioner on the said post based on such revaluation within the time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
It is argued by Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent No.2 that for the relief as sought in the present petition, the petitioner has already submitted a representation on 11.11.2021 before the respondent No.2/Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Prayagraj, copy of which is appended as Annexure No.8 to the writ petition. It is further argued that the respondent no.2 will decide the aforesaid representation expeditiously.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection if the aforesaid representation has been decided within a time bound period.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the undertaking given by Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent No.2, this petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from today.
Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondents is directed to communicate regarding this order to respondent No.2/Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Prayagraj. The information given by him to respondent no.2 shall also deem to be sufficient in the matter.
Order Date :- 24.12.2021 Pramod Tripathi Digitally signed by Justice Prakash Padia Date: 2021.12.24 16:37:01 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Akhilendra Pratap Singh vs State Of U P Thru Secretary Home Lknw And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 December, 2021
Judges
  • Prakash Padia
Advocates
  • Ashish Kumar Gaur Sanjay Pandey