Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Akhilesh And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 33
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5244 of 2019 Petitioner :- Akhilesh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned A.G.A. for the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3; and perused the record.
The instant petition seeks quashing of the first information report dated 02.02.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 0085 of 2019, under Sections 363, 366, 506 IPC and Sections 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Kotwali Orai, District Jalaun at Orai.
The allegation in the impugned first information report, which has been lodged by the father of the victim, is that the victim Sonali, aged about 16 years, whose date of birth is 19.12.2002, has been enticed away by the accused. The petitioners have approached this Court by claiming that the petitioner no.1 and the victim Sonali have entered into a relationship voluntarily and that no force has been used upon her and that both the petitioner no.1 and the petitioner no.2 are adult.
There is no documentary evidence on record to show that the petitioner no.2 (Sonali) is an adult, whereas in the first information report it is stated that the victim Sonali is aged about 16 years with date of birth 19.02.2002.
Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners to quash the first information report is rejected.
However, we deem it appropriate to dispose off this petition by providing as follows:-
The petitioner no.1 shall produce the petitioner no.2 (Sonali) before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun at Orai by or before 11th March, 2019. Upon her production, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun at Orai shall proceed to record the statement of Sonali to ascertain whether any force has been used on her or she has been voluntarily in the company of the petitioner no.1. In case the victim deposes before the Chief Judicial Magistrate that force has been used on her, the Chief Judicial Magistrate shall proceed to pass appropriate orders immediately in respect of the custody/protection of the victim. However, in case the victim deposes that she has been voluntarily in the company of the petitioner no.1 or any other person and that no force has been used on her, learned Magistrate shall call upon the Investigating Officer of the case and fix a date for appearance of the informant or the parents or natural guardian of the victim for the purpose of determining the age of the victim. On the date so fixed, the learned Magistrate shall proceed to determine the age of the victim as per law, keeping in mind the provisions that are applicable for determination of the age of a victim and may, if necessary, direct for ossification test/medical examination of the victim from a District Government Hospital. If the victim is found to be a minor, the learned Magistrate shall proceed to pass appropriate orders in respect of custody of the victim, as per law. However, in case the victim is found to be an adult, he shall proceed to record the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
On the basis of the statement of the victim and the age of the victim as determined above, the police shall submit report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.
The aforesaid exercise shall be completed preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of the victim before the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. Till 11th March, 2019, or the date on which the victim is produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in the above case. Thereafter, if the victim is produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, as directed above, the accused shall be dealt with as per the statement of the victim. Though, in the event the victim is found to be minor, the police would be free to take the investigation to its logical conclusion and may effect arrest of the accused.
It is made clear that if the victim is not produced on the date fixed, as above, the interim protection shall stand discharged and the investigating officer would be free to take steps to bring the investigation to its logical conclusion including arrest of the accused, if required.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is
disposed off.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 Lbm/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Akhilesh And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Manoj Misra
Advocates
  • Raj Kumar