Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Akhil vs Mamlatdar

High Court Of Gujarat|10 July, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.M.B.
Rana, learned advocate for the petitioner, prays for time, in order to ascertain the correct address of respondent No.4, who has not been served, as it is stated that the said Company is closed.
Ms.Seeja Nair, learned advocate, states that Mr.G.M. Amin, learned advocate has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.3 and shall be filing the Vakalatnama and affidavit-in-reply, if any, during the course of the day.
List on 30.07.2012.
(Smt.
Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Akhil vs Mamlatdar

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
10 July, 2012

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.