Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Akbari Begum And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32828 of 2019 Applicant :- Akbari Begum And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Diwan Saifullah Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard Sri Diwan Saifullah Khan, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Nagendra Bahadur Singh and Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsels for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicant no.1 is mother-in-law and applicant no.2 is married sister-in-law of the informant. She has lodged false and frivolous F.I.R. against the applicants and other family members including her husband. The allegations contained in the F.I.R. against them are general and sweeping in nature. Their case is distinguishable from that of husband of the first informant. The applicants have no criminal antecedent to his credit. Therefore, the applicants may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation and the fact that he has no criminal antecedents, the applicants are entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.
In the event of arrest of the applicants, Akbari Begum and Afsana Begum involved in Case Crime No. 0364 of 2019 under Sections 323, 354Kha, 376/511, 498-A I.P.C. and 3/4 DP Act, Police Station Sigra, District Varanasi, they shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on each of them furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police office as and when required;
(ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office;
(iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.
The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order independently without being prejudice by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.
The applicants are directed to produce a certified copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
In view of aforesaid, the application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, allowed.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 MN/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Akbari Begum And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Diwan Saifullah Khan