Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Akbar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20171 of 2019 Applicant :- Akbar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Mobeen Khan,Nazrul Islam Jafri Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Rejoinder affidavit filed today by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
Heard Shri N.I. Jafri, learned Senior Advocated assisted by Shri S.I. Jafri, learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Akbar with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 326 of 2019, under Section 364-A IPC, Police Station Loni District- Ghaziabad, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. The further submission is that informant is son of the accused Gulab and other co-accused Deepak is relative of the abducted child .Applicant is well known to both the parties and is doctor by profession.He has been implicated on account of dispute between the parties. He has no role to play in the entire dispute of abduction. The child was recovered on 24.3.2019 when he was abducted on 19.3.2019 and no First Information Report was lodged from 19.3.2019 to 23.3.2019. The applicant is languishing in jail since 24.3.2019, who is not a previous convict. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Akbar involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 Atul kr. sri.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Akbar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Mohd Mobeen Khan Nazrul Islam Jafri