Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31825 of 2021 Applicant :- Akash Srivastava @ Prinsoo Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jagat Narayan Mishra,Krishna Dutt Mishra,Yogesh Kumar Vaish Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record..
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.0041 of 2021, under Sections- 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-
B IPC, Police Station- Collector Ganj, District- Kanpur Nagar, during pendency of trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that the as per the FIR, the applicant himself has sold his car and made a complaint that his car has been stolen by someone in order to get the ensured money from the insurance company which was in the name of his mother. It is next contended that entire prosecution story is forged and frivolous. It is further contended by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused- Rajesh Kumar Tripahti and Amar Singh had already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.8.2021 and 14.9.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 25410 of 2021 and 31899 of 2021. It is next submitted that the wife of the applicant is keeping unwell due to cardiac arrest and therefore, he may be released on bail. The applicant is in jail since 19.5.2021 and has no criminal history and if he is released on bail, there is no chance of his absconding or misusing the liberty of bail or tampering with the prosecution witnesses.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail. The application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Akash Srivastava @ Prinsoo who is involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 30.9.2021 Akbar