Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ajmal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15812 of 2021 Applicant :- Ajmal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Bharti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
As per Resolution dated 07.04.2021 of the Committee of this Court for the purpose of taking preventive and remedial measures and for combating the impending threat of Covid-19, this case is being heard by way of virtual mode.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State through video conferencing.
The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to grant bail to the applicant, Ajmal, in Case Crime No.16 of 2021, under Sections- 392, 411, 34 I.P.C., Police Station- Garhi Pukhta, District- Shamli.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated by the police in this case. The applicant is not named in the first information report. He has further submitted that the alleged looted money Rs.4,000/- recovered from the possession of applicant, belongs to the applicant. It has been further submitted that there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. There are no criminal antecedents of the applicant. He further submits that there are no chances of applicant's fleeing from the judicial process or tampering with the prosecution evidence and in case the applicant is released on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.2.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that looted money Rs.4,000/- has been recovered from the possession of applicant, however, he conceded the fact that there are no criminal antecedents of the applicant.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, without commenting on merits of the case and considering the rival submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Ajmal, involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 31.5.2021 Anil K. Sharma
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajmal vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2021
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ojha
Advocates
  • Pankaj Bharti