Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Ajitsinh vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|09 February, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[1] The present application is filed seeking to release the applicant on anticipatory bail as he is apprehending his arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-147 of 2011 registered with G.I.D.C. Vatva Police Station.
[2] Heard learned advocate for the applicant. It is submitted by learned advocate for the applicant that present applicant purchased land of Swami Samarth Cooperative Housing Society from one Girish Babulal Solanki accused no.2 and accused no.5. Before purchasing the land, public advertisement was also given by the applicant. Title clearance was also obtained from the advocate.
[3] This Court has gone through the complaint. There is no allegation of fraud or forgery in executing agreement to sale and it was registered before the Registrar. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering allegations made in the complaint, role attributed to the applicant, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Reported in [2011]1 SCC 694, wherein the Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitutional Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. Reported in [1980]2 SCC 565.
[4] In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with C.R.No.I-147 of 2011 registered with G.I.D.C. Vatva Police Station for the offences alleged against him, the applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees ten thousand only] with one surety of the like amount on the following conditions that he shall:
co-operate with the investigation and make himself available whenever required;
remain present before the concerned Police Station on 14th February, 2012 between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m..;
not hamper the investigation in any manner nor shall directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness so as to dissuade them for disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
at the time of execution of bond, shall furnish address to the Investigating Officer and the Court concerned and shall not change residence till the final disposal of the case or till further orders;
not leave India without the permission of the Court and, if holding Passport, surrender the same before the trial Court immediately;
[5] It would be open to the Investigating Officer to file an application for remand if he considers it proper and just; and the competent Court would decide it on merits.
[6] At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
[7] Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.
[M.D.Shah, J.] satish Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajitsinh vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
09 February, 2012