Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Ajith Unnikrishnan vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala|27 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ This is a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.193/2013 of Karikkottakari Police Station registered for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Petitioners have come up with this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for getting Annexure-A final report in Crime No.193/2013 of Karikottakari Police Station as against the petitioners and all further proceedings based on it in C.C.202/2014 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Mattannur, quashed.
4. The allegation against the petitioners is that they have tortured and harassed the de facto complainant, who is the wife of the 1st petitioner, and treated her with cruelty within the meaning of Section 498A IPC, by demanding more dowry, after misappropriating her entire gold ornaments and money.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the defacto complainant, who is the 2nd respondent herein, and learned Public Prosecutor.
6. According to the petitioners, all the matters in dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant have been amicably settled and presently the defacto complainant has no complaints against the petitioners and, therefore, the proceedings against the petitioners may be quashed.
7. The defacto complainant, who is the 2nd respondent herein, has filed an affidavit affirming that all the matters in dispute between her and the petitioners have been amicably settled and, therefore, she has no complaints against the petitioners and, therefore, all further proceedings in the matter referred to above can be quashed. She has entered appearance through her counsel. The learned counsel for the defacto complainant also endorses the fact that the affidavit has been sworn in by the defacto complainant on her own volition.
8. When all the matrimonial disputes have been settled between the parties and as the defacto complainant has no complaints against the petitioners, it is only just and expedient in the interest of justice to quash the proceedings referred to above.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed and Annexure-A final report in Crime No.193/2013 of Karikottakari Police Station as against the petitioners and all further proceedings based on it in C.C.202/2014 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Mattannur are hereby quashed.
Sd/-
(B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/27/11 // True Copy // PA to Judge
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajith Unnikrishnan vs State Of Kerala

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2014
Judges
  • B Kemal Pasha
Advocates
  • Sri Nireesh Mathew
  • Sri
  • N P Prajeesh