IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.52284 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN MR. AJIT PRAKASH, S/O LATE SHRI M.R.K. NAIR, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. B.306, 3RD FLOOR, KRISHNA LILAC APARTMENTS, KAIKONDANAHALLI, SARJAPUR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560104. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SREEVATSA S, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. UDITA RAMESH, ADVOCATES) AND 1. MRS. SHEENAM OHRIE, W/O ALOK OHRIE, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3711, 13TH D MAIN, 10TH CROSS, HAL 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE – 560008.
2. MR. ALOK OHRIE, S/O LATE S.S. OHRIE, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3711, 13TH D MAIN, 10TH CROSS, HAL 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE – 560008.
3. MR. HIREN ISRANI, S/O HEMAN ISRANI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT LCG 302A, LABURNUM, SUSHANT LOK1, GURGAON - 122209.
4. MR. GANESH MARGABANDHU, S/O D.R. MARGABANDHU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 620, 22ND B MAIN, HSR LAYOUT, 2ND SECTOR, BANGALORE - 560101.
5. SHALIESH AGARWAL, S/O KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT 1ST FLOOR, SALEH CENTER ANNEXE, 18/4, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE - 560052.
RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 5 REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, SRI. MANJUNATH C.K, S/O KRISHNA, AGE 37 YEARS, FIRST FLOOR, SALEH CENTRE ANNEXE, 18/4 CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560052. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DHANANJAY JOSHI FOR SRI. VARSHA R, ADVOCATES FOR C/R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH NO.12) ON 2.12.2019 IN EX NO.2568/2016 AS PER ANENXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Both the sides having argued the matter for some time are broadly in agreement with the suggestion of this court that the petitioner shall furnish all necessary particulars as is required of him under the order in question within a period of 10 days failing which the impugned order of arrest and detention shall stand revived.
Ordered accordingly.
It is made clear that notwithstanding the vacation, the compliance should be reported to the Registry of the Court below and also the copies of the particulars shall be served on the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-decree holder as well, within the said period.
It is needless to mention that the said arrest warrant shall not be given effect to, subject to what is stated above.
Writ Petition is disposed off, accordingly.
cbc Sd/- JUDGE