Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11910 of 2003 Petitioner :- Ajit Giri Goswami Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Pal Singh Kasyap,Rajen Mawar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press the writ petition. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i) J)s; U;k;ky; }kjk funs'kkRed ¼ijekns'k½ ¼mandamus½ izd`fr esa izkns'k] funsZ'k] vkns'k vFkok fl}kUr] ;kfp@ vkosnd ds i{k esa] fo:) izR;kFkhZ@foi{k] ikfjr djrs gq;s izR;kFkhZ@ foi{k] dks funsZf'kr djus dh vuqdEik dh tkos fd lewg x p;u izfd;k 2001 ds ifjizsz{; esa] ftyk p;u lfefr] lewg x ijh{kk] tuin cjsyh }kjk fnukad 06 tuojh 2002 dks lHkkxkj dysDVªsV] cjsyh ij vk;ksftr dh x;h vk'kqys[ku @Vad.k ijh{kk] ftlesa ;kph @vkosnd] ijh{kk izos'k i=] vuqdzekad 48000006 fnukafdr 31 vxLr 2001 ¼bl ;kfpdk ds lkFk vuqyXud la[;k& 2 esa fofgr½ rFkk lwpuk i=d la[;k& 118@ lk0 lgk0&lewg x ijh{kk& 2001 fnukafdr 28 fnlEcj 2001 ¼bl ;kfpdk ds lkFk vuqyXud la[;k& 3 esa fofgr½ ds vk/kkj ij lfEefyr gqvk dk ijh.kke] izR;kFkhZ@ foi{k la[;k& 2 vFkkZr~ ftykf/kdkjh ,oa v/;{k p;u lfefr ¼lewg x ijh{kk½ tuin cjsyh] vfoyEc@ J)s; U;k;ky; }kjk] bl fufeRr fu/kkZfjr le;kUrxZr ?kksf"kr djus ds mijkUr] p;fur vH;fFkZ;ksa dks rRdky fu;qfDr o dk;ZHkkj iznku fd;s tkus gsrq] ;Fkksfpr vkns'k ikfjr djuk lqfuf'pr djsaA "(ii) J)s; U;k;ky; }kjk funs'kkRed ¼ijekns'k½ ¼mandamus½ izd`fr esa izkns'k] funsZ'k] vkns'k vFkok fl}kUr] ;kfp@ vkosnd ds i{k esa] fo:) izR;kFkhZ@foi{k] ikfjr djrs gq;s izR;kFkhZ@ foi{k] dks funsZf'kr djus dh vuqdEik dh tkos fd og ;kfp @ vkosnd ,oa mlds ln`'k vU; lHkh vH;kfFkZ;ksa] tks foKfIr fnukafdr 29 vxLr 2001 ds vk/kkj ij vkosnu djus rFkk fyf[kr ijh{kk fnukafdr 7 vDVwcj 2001 es fof/kor p;u ds mijkUr] fnukad 06 tuojh 2002 dks vk;ksftr vk'kqys[ku @Vad.k ijh{kk] esa lfEefyr gq,] dks J)s; U;k;ky; }kjk] izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr fu/kkZfjr {k;iwfrZ ifjO;; @ izfrdj]J)s; U;k;ky; }kjk bl fufeRr fu/kkZfjr le;kUrxZr iznku djsaA"
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Ravi Prakash