Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ajijur Rahman vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 August, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel.
In view of the proposed order, requirement of issuance of notice to the respondent nos.4 and 5 is hereby dispensed with.
Considering the innocuous nature of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction to respondent no.3 to expedite the proceedings of Mutation Case No.475/280/241 (New Case No.2787/2017), Ajijur Rahman vs.Smt. Sudama and conclude the same expeditiously, say, within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the court concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
It is further directed that the parties to the case shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
Order Date :- 30.8.2019 akhilesh/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajijur Rahman vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 August, 2019
Judges
  • Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya