Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ajeet vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24984 of 2019 Applicant :- Ajeet Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Maohammd Nadeem,Ashish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G.
A. for the State.
I have perused the prosecution story as set up in the FIR and also the bail rejection order.
The contention as raised at the bar by learned counsel for the applicant is that the co-accused Govind Kashyap has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 24.1.2019, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3420 of 2019 (Govind Kashyap vs. State of U.P.), copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the bail application. He further submits that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of the co-accused who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. He next submitted that criminal history of the applicant has been explained in paragraph 16 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. Learned counsel for the applicant lastly submits that the applicant is in jail since 22.5.2019.
The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However, he does not dispute the fact that the similarly placed co-accused has been granted bail by this Court.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A. G. A. and the fact that identically placed co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out. However, the said prima facie view will not in any manner adversely affect the case of the prosecution.
In view of the above, let the applicant-Ajeet be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 741 of 2018, under Sections 394 IPC, P.S.-Chhibramau, District-Kannauj, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complaint in any manner whatsoever.
(ii) The applicant will abide by the orders of the court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activity.
(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 25.6.2019 LN Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajeet vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 June, 2019
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Maohammd Nadeem Ashish Kumar