Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ajay Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22189 of 2019 Applicant :- Ajay Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Srivastava,S0014 Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
By means of this application, the applicant Ajay Yadav, who is involved in Case Crime No. 25 of 2019, under Sections 392, 411, 120-B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 328, 342, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Maudaha, District Hamirpur, is seeking enlargement on bail.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number. Co-accused Avanis @ Billu, Satyendra Rajpoot @ Shiva and Kambod Singh Rajpoot have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 5.4.2019, 24.4.2019 and 26.4.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 14266 of 2019, 17109 of 2019 and 17749 of 2019. Accused-applicant is of no criminal antecedent. Hence bail has been prayed for.
Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the rival submissions, nature of accusation, severity of punishment in case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, this bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Ajay Yadav, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned, subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.
In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 NS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajay Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2019
Judges
  • Ram Krishna Gautam
Advocates
  • Vikas Srivastava S0014