Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ajay vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40639 of 2019 Applicant :- Ajay Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Datta Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, and learned A. G. A. for the State.
The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 303 of 2019, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 IPC and section 60, 62, 72 Excise Act, Police Station Tarya Sujan, District Kushi Nagar with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.
I have perused the FIR as well as the order by means of which the anticipatory bail application has been rejected by the court below.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the impugned FIR and also looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment and the fact that recovery has been made from the vehicle, owner of which is the applicant, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 Kuldeep
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajay vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Krishna Datta Tiwari