Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ajay Kumar Gupta vs Pariyojna Prabandhak U P Purva Sainik Kalyan Nigam & Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33058 of 2001 Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Pariyojna Prabandhak U.P.Purva Sainik Kalyan Nigam & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person,A.K. Gupta,Vinay Khare Counsel for Respondent :- S.C., Deepak Gaur
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
“(a) issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 25.9.2001 (Annexure no. 4) passed by respondent no. 1.
(b) issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner.”
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ajay Kumar Gupta vs Pariyojna Prabandhak U P Purva Sainik Kalyan Nigam & Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • In
  • Gupta Vinay Khare