Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

A.Jannet Mary vs The Director Of Secondary ...

Madras High Court|29 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent development nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect.
2. recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
29.06.2017 sli/jer Index : Yes (or) No Internet Yes (or) No To
1. The Director of Secondary Education, Chennai-600 006.
2. The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai-600 006.
3. The Director Elementary Educational officer, Thirunelveli.
4. The Director Elementary Educational Officer, Dharmapuri.
5. The Additional Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Radhapuram, Thirunelveli.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J sli/jer W.P. Nos.40305 & 40306 of 2002 and W.P.M.P.Nos.59823 & 59824 of 2002 29.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

A.Jannet Mary vs The Director Of Secondary ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
29 June, 2017