IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.368 OF 2018 BETWEEN THE AIRCRAFT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, NO.15, I CROSS, CKC GARDEN OPP B.I.O HOSPITAL K H ROAD (DOUBLE ROAD) BANGALORE – 560 027.
NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/CEO H BALAJI.
... PETITIONER (BY SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND 1. SMT. NAGAMANI RAMESH W/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.1113/1189 7TH CROSS, 1ST E MAIN GIRINAGAR 2ND PHASE BANGALORE – 560 085.
2. SRI M LOKESHWARA S/O MADHU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO.G-330, 2ND MAIN 7TH CROSS, OLD TOWNSHIP HAL COLONY BANGALORE – 560 017.
3. SRI B K NARYANMURTHY S/O LATE B V KRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A NO.1102, 24TH MAIN 17TH CROSS, BSK 2ND STAGE BANGALORE – 560 070.
4. SRI SACHIN SRINATH S/O SRINATHKALAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 5. SMT SUSHMA C R W/O SACHIN SRINATH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT 692, 8TH MAIN, 7TH SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT BANGALORE – 560 102.
6. SRI VARGIS S/O LATE P V ANTHONY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.165/26, I FLOOR 4TH CROSS, S G PALYA VENKATESHWARA LAYOUT BANGALORE – 560 029.
7. SMT M USHABAI W/O SRI H GANESH KANDAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.G-238, 2ND MAIN HAL OLD TOWNSHIP BANGALORE – 560 017.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.SUBRAMANYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2, R3 AND R7 SERVED) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.05.2018 PASSED ON I.A.NO.VII IN OS NO.26945/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the disposal of the suit in O.S.No.26945/2013 on the file of the XXVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, the present civil revision petition would not survive for consideration.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the civil revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE SMJ