At the outset, Mr. Yadav, learned advocate for OL, has requested for two weeks' time in light of the communication dated 27.2.2012 received by the office of OL from the concerned Chartered Accountant asking for certain details for preparing and submitting the report, including the report as regards the ratio for disbursement of the amount amongst the workers, if the Court decides that the workers of the concerned unit are also entitled for payment.
2. On behalf of Mr. Gori, learned advocate for the respondent No.5, also request for adjournment is made by one of the workers / members of the respondent No.5 - union on the ground that due to illness of his relative, Mr. Gori, learned advocate for the respondent No.5, is not able to attend the Court proceedings today.
3. However, Mr. Vasavada, learned advocate for the applicant - union, submitted that on account of Mr. Gori's absence, the application is not being heard and therefore, the submissions on behalf of the applicant - union may be taken into consideration while considering the request made by Chartered Accountant for more time to determine the ratio.
3.1 Therefore, submissions on behalf of the applicant - union by Mr. Vasavada, learned advocate, are heard today.
4. However, in view of the request on behalf of Mr. Gori, learned advocate for respondent No.5, for adjournment on the ground of aforesaid personal difficulty and in view of the request made by Mr. Yadav, learned advocate for OL, the hearing is adjourned to 15.3.2012.
(K.M.Thaker, J.) kdc