IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT APPEAL NO.182 OF 2016 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S. AHMED TIMBER REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR UNCHI MONU, SON OF AHMED, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT KUPPEPADAVU VILLAGE AND POST MUTTUR VILLAGE, MANGALURU TALUK-574 103 D.K. DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT (BY SRI S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATIVE OF FOREST ARANYA BHAVAN, MALLESHWARAM 18TH CROSS, BENGALURU-560 003.
3. DEPUTY CONSERVATIVE OF FOREST MANGALURU DIVISION, MANNAGUDDA, MANGALURU CITY D.K. DISTRICT-575 003.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2015 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE HIGH COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.5512 OF 2014 (GM-RES) AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION WITH COST AS PRAYED FOR UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEF’S AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
***** THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not intend to press this appeal. However, he pleads that on an application being made for relocating the Sawmill, the same may be considered by the respondents.
2. In view of the submission made, the appeal is disposed off. On an application being filed by the appellant for relocation of the Sawmill or otherwise, the same may be considered by the respondents in accordance with law.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE JJ/-