Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ahmad Wasi Shah vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 4
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 30225 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ahmad Wasi Shah Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Dhaka Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J. Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 15.10.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 370 of 2018, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Mandawar, District Bijnor.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is merely a witness of the sale deed. Moreover apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned FIR lodged by the the respondent no. 3 alleging commission of offences by the petitioner under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., no evidence is forthcoming, even prima facie indicating that any such incident, as alleged in the FIR, had ever taken place and hence the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed.
Per contra learned AGA submitted that the impugned FIR is not liable to be quashed on the basis of the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner for the reason that from the perusal of the impugned FIR and the allegations made therein it cannot be said that prima facie no cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned FIR as well as the other material brought on record, we are not inclined to quash the impugned FIR.
However, considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the present case litigation is still pending and some of the courts have decided the issue in favour of the petitioner, made in the impugned FIR, the provisions of section 157 Cr.P.C. and the view taken by the Apex Court in the case of Joginder Kumar Versus State of U.P. 1994 Cr.L.J., 1981, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in above mentioned case, till the credible evidence is not collected by the I.O. during pendency of the investigation.
With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.10.2018 SA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ahmad Wasi Shah vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2018
Judges
  • Bala Krishna Narayana
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar Dhaka