Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ahmad Riyaj vs Farid Ahmad Khan

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5576 of 2019 Applicant :- Ahmad Riyaj Opposite Party :- Farid Ahmad Khan, Tehsildar Counsel for Applicant :- Juned Alam
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
By order dated 25.9.2018 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.4448 of 2018 filed by the applicant, the Court directed as under:
"It would serve no purpose to keep the writ petition pending, and therefore, it is directed that if no proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 have already been registered in relation to encroachment over the said plot, the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar shall inquire into the allegations made by the petitioner after following the procedure prescribed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 and pass appropriate orders within a period of six months. In case the allegations of the petitioner are found to be true, the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar shall ensure that the encroachments over the Gaon Sabha land are removed within a period of one month thereafter unless the order of Assistant Collector/Tehsildar is stayed by any superior authority or court in any appeal or revision filed against the order of Assistant Collector/Tehsildar. It is also directed that, if the petitioner or any other member of the Gaon Sabha files an application in the case registered before the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar, to be heard in opposition to the noticee in the said cases, the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar shall afford a reasonable opportunity to the said persons to oppose the defence, if any, taken by the noticee.
It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the claim as raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition.
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of."
A certified copy of the aforesaid order was submitted for compliance before the opposite party but the opposite party has wilfully not complied with the order and, thus, has committed civil contempt liable for punishment under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Prima facie a case of contempt has been made out. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, one more opportunity is afforded to the opposite party to comply with the aforesaid order of the Court within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite party and another self-addressed stamped envelope to the office within one week from today.
The office shall send a copy of this order along with the self- addressed envelope of the applicant with a copy of contempt application to the opposite party within one week thereafter and keep a recorded thereof.
The opposite party shall comply with the directions of the writ court and intimate him of the order through the self-addressed envelop within a week thereafter.
With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of at this stage with liberty to the applicant to move a fresh application, if the order is not complied with by the opposite party within the stipulated time as aforementioned.
Order Date :- 29.8.2019 RKP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ahmad Riyaj vs Farid Ahmad Khan

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 August, 2019
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Juned Alam