Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ahatesham vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2717 of 2019 Applicant :- Ahatesham Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kripa Shanker Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Ahatesham seeking bail in Case Crime No. 171 of 2018, under Sections 323, 377, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of POCSO Act and Sections 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Kheta Sarai, District Jaunpur.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next drawn the attention of the Court towards the statement of the victims, in which, it is alleged that the applicant has committed unnatural offence with them.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next drawn the attention of the Court towards the injuries of the victims, in which, as per the injury report, no external injury has been found on any of the victims and there is only complain of pain.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that medical report completely falsifies the prosecution story and the police report has already been submitted in the present case and the chances of trial being concluded in near future is very bleak due to heavy dockets.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that the applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is in jail since 06.10.2018 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
Per contra, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts and the fact that the applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is in jail since 06.10.2018.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant Ahatesham be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 21.1.2019 Nadim
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ahatesham vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 January, 2019
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Kripa Shanker