Being aggrieved of Exts.P1 and P1(a) assessment orders, the petitioner filed Exts.P2 and P2(a) appeals along with interlocutory applications for stay. The said applications for stay were considered and Exts.P3 and P3(a) orders were passed directing the petitioner to remit 30% of the disputed liability, so as to avail the benefit of interim stay. Subsequently, on filing petitions for extension of time, they were considered and extension was granted as per Exts.P4 and P4(a) orders. The petitioner, in fact, is aggrieved of the condition imposed vide Exts.P3 and P3(a).
2. During the course of hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer pressed before this Court is to grant some breathing time to comply with the condition imposed vide Exts.R3 and R3(a). Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is granted extension by a period of three weeks to comply with the condition.
The writ petition is disposed of.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE lk