Manjula Chellur, C.J.
When learned counsel appearing for petitioner was asked whether there is any basis to seek reliefs sought in the writ petition, as the writ petition is as bald as possible with regard to factual situation in the State of Kerala, he sought permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Except mentioning various provisions of Education Act of 2009, nothing else is mentioned how the provisions of this Act are violated in respect of which area in the State of Kerala. No doubt, several ideas are mentioned in the writ petition without reference to any institution or management. In the absence of such factual situation we fail to understand how such writ petition could be entertained.
WP(C) No. 16195 of 2014 -:2:-
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Hence Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Manjula Chellur, Chief Justice.
P.R. Ramachandra Menon, Judge.
ttb/26/06