Court No. - 83
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28068 of 2021 Petitioner :- M/S Adinath Probuilt India And Another Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarveshwar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by the order passed under Section 33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 by the Additional Collector (Finance and Revenue) the instrument has been impounded and after assessing the stamp duty on the instrument, a recovery certificate has been issued. It is contended that challenging the aforesaid order, a revision has been filed before the Board of Revenue under Section 56(1) of the Act but, though that revision has been filed along with a stay application, the same is not being decided by the Board of Revenue.
Learned Standing Counsel states that Board of Revenue would take a decision on the stay application.
Under the circumstances, this petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to produce a certified copy of this order before the Board of Revenue on the next date fixed. If the order is so produced by the petitioner before the Board of Revenue, it is expected that the Board of Revenue shall consider the stay application for interim relief in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.10.2021 A. V. Singh (Jayant Banerji, J.)