Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Adil Sami vs State Of Up And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17096 of 2018 Applicant :- Adil Sami Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Saoud Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Correction Application No. 1 of 2018.
Heard Mr. Saoud Alam, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
This correction has been filed seeking correction in the order dated 21.05.2018.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to an inadvertent mistake one of the charging section, i.e. Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act has not been transcribed in the order dated 21.05.2018. He therefore submits that the order dated 21.05.2018 be corrected accordingly.
Prayer made for is bonafide. Accordingly, the same is allowed.
After the word IPC as occurring in the last line of the second paragraph of the order dated 21.05.2018 Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act shall also be read.
This correction shall form part of the earlier order dated 21.05.2018.
With the aforesaid directions, this correction application stands finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 YK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Adil Sami vs State Of Up And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2018
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Saoud Alam