Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Adhilakshmi vs The Commissioner Of Police And Others

Madras High Court|14 March, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 14.03.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH H.C.P No.2058 of 2016 Adhilakshmi .. Petitioner Vs
1. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai – 7.
2. The Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.
.. Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate order or direction in the nature of a writ, call for the records in No.1003/ BCDFGISSSV/ 2016 on the file of the first respondent, quash the detention order 31.08.2016 and direct the production of the detenu Ruban son of Natarajan, presently detained at the Central Prison, Puzhal, under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 as a Goonda, before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balasubramaniam For respondents : Mr.V.M.R. Rajentren Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner, who is the wife of the detenu Ruban, S/o.Natarajan, aged 36 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the first respondent dated 31.08.2016 against her husband branding him as a "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the order of detention passed by the first respondent as against her husband dated 31.08.2016 has been revoked by the Government in G.O. [Rt] No.5305 Home, Prohibition & Excise [XIII] Department dated 24.10.2016 and he has also produced a copy of the said order.
3. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed as the same has become infructuous.
Index : Yes/no Internet : Yes/no sr (S.N.J.,) (A.S.M.J.,) 14-03-2017 To
1. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai – 7.
2. The Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.
S.NAGAMUTHU,J.
And
ANITA SUMANTH,J.,
sr Order in H.C.P.No.2058 of 2016 14.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Adhilakshmi vs The Commissioner Of Police And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 March, 2017
Judges
  • S Nagamuthu
  • Anita Sumanth