Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Adarsh Yadav @ Mulayam Yadav And Ors vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9648 of 2021 Applicant :- Adarsh Yadav @ Mulayam Yadav And 3 Ors Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amarnath Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge-sheet dated 13.10.2018 and cognizance order dated 27.08.2019 as well as entire proceedings of Case No. 1048 of 2019 (State Vs. Adarsh Yadav and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 364 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 326-A IPC, Police Station Chaubeypur, District Varanasi, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate IIIrd, Varanasi.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he does not want to press other prayers made in the prayer clause and has only made a prayer for expeditious disposal of his bail application in view of law laid down in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Considering the prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if the applicants appear/ surrender before the court below and apply for bail within one month from today, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
For a period of one month from today or till the applicants appear/ surrender and apply for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. However in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 CrPC is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 27.7.2021 Nadim Digitally signed by Justice Rajiv Gupta Date: 2021.07.28 13:39:37 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Adarsh Yadav @ Mulayam Yadav And Ors vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Amarnath Tripathi