When the matter came up for hearing today, the petitioner as well as the second respondent/defacto complainant are personally present before this Court and identified themselves.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) for the first respondent.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that pending proceedings in S.T.C.No.2230 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Puducherry, the second respondent/de-facto complainant and the petitioner have amicably settled the issue among themselves and to this effect, the de-facto complainant has also filed an affidavit dated 01.08.2017 stating that he has no objection if the proceedings in S.T.C.No.2230 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Puducherry is quashed.
4.Recording the submissions made by the defacto complainant in the affidavit filed by her dated 01.08.2017, the entire proceedings in S.T.C.No.2230 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Puducherry is quashed. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands closed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
01.08.2017 DP To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Puducherry.
2.The Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
M.S.RAMESH.J, DP Crl.OP No.125 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No.90 of 2017 01.08.2017