Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Acrologic Business Solutions ... vs Satheesh Kumar Manoharan @ Sam

Madras High Court|20 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The respondent has not filed any reply. The respondent disputed the execution of the agreement and thus, learned counsel for the petitioner had prayed for one week's time to file the affidavit of witnesses. Those affidavits have also not been filed. None appears for the petitioner and the respondent as well. Parties do not seem to be interested in proceeding with the matter.
Original petition is, thus, closed with liberty to revive when directions passed in the order dated 18.11.2016 are complied with.
(S.K.K., CJ.) 20.01.2017 sra The Hon'ble Chief Justice (sra) O.P.No.697 of 2016 20.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Acrologic Business Solutions ... vs Satheesh Kumar Manoharan @ Sam

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 January, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.