IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.P.No.10359/2019 (EDN-EX) BETWEEN :
ABRAHAM FRANCIS S/O. M.A.FRANCIS AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS OLD “MUTTUNGAL HOUSE”, NO.49/1062 VYTILLA P.O., COCHIN, INDIA-682019 (BY SMT.LAKSHMI MENON, ADV. FOR KAMATH AND KAMATH) ...PETITIONER AND :
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION 6TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE -560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4TH T –BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU, KARNATAKA – 560 041 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR 3. SRINIVAS INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTRE MUKKA, SURATHKAL KARNATAKA – 575 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R1; SRI. N.K.RAMESH, ADV., FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO RE-VALUATE THE ANSWER SCRIPTS OF THE PETITIONER PERTAINING TO OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, PAPER-I (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the parties submit ad idem that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.48194-198/2018 and allied matters disposed of on 21.12.2018 wherein a writ of mandamus has been issued to the respondent-University to send such of the answer papers of the petitioner, whereby, the percentage difference amongst the valuations (two in the case of U.G. course and four in the case of P.G. course, as the case may be) in terms of Ordinance dated 15.6.2012 as worked out in paragraphs 25 and 26 therein, for third or fifth valuation, as the case may be, forthwith.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the subject matter of this writ petition being U.G course, the respondent-University shall send the answer papers of the petitioner in terms of the Ordinance dated 15.06.2012 as worked out in paragraph 25 of the order in the batch of writ petitions referred to above for third valuation, forthwith.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE HJ